
Everything I'd read about
Tino Sehgal's exhibition at the Guggenheim made me want to see it. So, I went.
The first thing you see is a pair of dancers cavorting in slow motion on the floor. Not a good sign. (Slow-mo?! Really?) It's supposed to be subversive, two people engaged so intimately in public (let alone on display in a museum). It would've been more thrilling if they were actually making out in real time, and even an iota of sexual compatibility would've helped.
After about 90 seconds of standing over them to see how disciplined they were, I headed up the ramp behind my wife. At the first gallery, a young girl approached my wife. I had walked up into the gallery to enjoy the emptiness of it. The girl ushered my wife up the stairs and said, "Can I ask you a question?"
"Yes," said my wife.
"What is progress?" asked the girl.
She then lead my wife up the ramp as she answered the question. Anytime her answers seemed to lag, the girl would ask another question. A few levels up, she handed us off to a husky college student who launched into a dissertation about progress that was oh so very blogoriphic. We were supposed to be enamored with the idea that he had gobbled up Toll House cookie dough from the package when he was a kid and that the story on the back of the package was his idea of progress: a series of happy accidents.
Cute stuff, but it came out of him all wrong. Instead of being charmingly twee, he felt uncomfortable and rushed through his lines. It came off as canned. That left me wondering if it was assigned to him or if he came up with it himself, and why any of this was worth emptying out the rotunda. As we walked by the Anish Kapoor exhibit, and then when the entrance to the Paris avant-garde exhibit passed us by, I winced at the opportunity to encounter something more interesting.
Eventually, we were passed off to a woman in her late 50's/early 60's, who was the first to try and engage me. I simply walked and listened as my wife did the chatting. Most of our hosts seemed relieved at not having to bother with me. The older woman reverted to the child's mode of questioning, a cute narrative arc from innocence through sophism and back into open-mindedness. She asked us about the nature of accidental progress versus deliberate progress, and we ended with a discussion of how a musician such as myself has to rely on both.
It was a pleasant encounter. All of it was pleasant, for that matter. It was a bit like speed dating. Why it merited such a high profile showcase escaped both of us.
There was a heavy-handedness to walking up the spiralled rotunda as someone yammers on at you about progress. The 'Are We There Yet?' in-joke was tiresome, and when you're in the Guggenheim talking about progress, your brain is amped up to expect something a little more substantive than a prepackaged story about prepackaged foodstuff.
The exhibit did have one extremely pleasant side effect, though. For the rest of my time in the museum, I kept expecting strangers to talk to me, especially when they got within a certain range. That transformation of my personal space was quite delightful.
And it was a hoot to see all the hosts and hostesses lined up at their stations, waiting for their turn to talk to someone. It must have felt like being a hostess at a USO dance.
Labels: Guggenheim, Tino Sehgal